Published: 10 Sep 2007
By: Xun Ding

This article illustrates the translation to and from an ADO .NET DataSet and XML.

Introduction

Since the arrival of the Internet, people have become more and more dependent on it for daily operations. The Web's (as well as computing applications') insatiable appetite for data has grown even more intense. Most websites have seen the interplay of relational database and XML. Websites rely on relational databases for storing a vast amount of data and performing fast retrieval and manipulation. For exchanging data, they opt for protocols such as SOAP or REST (what strange names!). In these cases, XML serves both as the foundation and the ultimate representation form. Let's briefly look at the origin of XML and make a skim comparison between a relational database and the XML data model.

A brief history of XML

Relational database was born out of the ideas of an IBM mathematician and computer scientist, E. B. Codd, in the early 1970s. Since then it has become the "IT" player in the database industry. In comparison, XML is the new kid in town and it is the result of a never-ending quest for a simpler yet more powerful language for data storage and communication.

In 1986, SGML or "Standard Generalized Markup Language" was issued as an international standard. It is a complex and somewhat rigid language that requires expensive authoring tools. SGML was used extensively in large government, legal and publishing industries. In 1990, a simpler and more flexible language called HTML was created and it soon became enormously popular. However, its shortcomings also became increasingly visible. In 1996, the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (underwritten by Sun and other outside organizations) formed a committee to explore ways of harnessing the strength of HTML and SGML while sidestepping its limitations. The result is the creation of XML.

Relational Database and XML data model

A relational database consists of a collection of two-dimensional tables of rows and columns, interconnected by keys shared across tables. Through relations (shared keys), tables can be joined, queried and rearranged in different ways. There is no hierarchy or sequence to speak of.XML on the other hand is all about hierarchy and sequence, as it is mirrored in such terms, parents, children and siblings (it might as well be superiors, subordinates and colleagues).

Since its debut, XML has wooed techies and laymen alike with its easiness and flexibility; and the fact that it is human-readable. However, as much as XML has gained enormous momentum and widespread usage, relational database has long been the backbone infrastructure of enterprise applications; and proven to be effective and efficient. In the foreseeable future, relational database technology will remain the dominant technology, with major adoptions with respect to XML.

Many relational database vendors have provided extended database features to incorporate XML technology. For instance, SQL server has XQuery support and has a new XML data type. Likewise, middleware vendors have also provided native support for XML, like ADO.NET.

In ADO.NET, the central data object - the DataSet - represents a hierarchical, disconnected data cache. Its design is based on XML, which makes the translation between relational data and XML easy. The following discussion will use some examples to illustrate the ways to map a DataSet from and to a XML file.

Load a DataSet from XML

To load a DataSet from an XML file, simply call the DataSet.ReadXml method, like so:

Figure 1 shows a screenshot of the output:

Figure 1: Screenshot of the output

gridview1.jpg

In this example, a flat XML file with no hierarchy or nested element is selected. As a result, the DataSet contains only one table and it can be conveniently bound to a GridView.

Loading Schema Information from XML

The ReadXmlSchema or the InferXmlSchema methods of the DataSet allow you to load DataSet schema information from an XML document. Alternatively, you may use the overloaded ReadXml method with XmlReadMode.InferSchema as the second argument.

DataSet Schema information can be written to an .xsd file using the WriteXmlSchema method:

The following is the input XML file, books2.xml:

And here's the output file, books2.xsd:

The following figure shows a screenshot of the output table relationship:

Figure 2: Output table relationship

relations2.jpg

A somewhat more complicated XML file with a hierarchy of 3 tiers has been chosen for the example. It is worth noting how the relationship is constructed from the XML to DataSet transformation. The hierarchies are automatically translated into three tables and primary-foreign key pairs are inserted.

DataSet with a single table to XML

Want to map a DataSet containing a single table to XML? Piece of cake. The following code illustrates how to fork some information from an Access database into a table and write it to a XML file.

Here's a segment of the output XML file:

As you can see, the root element of the XML file takes the name of the DataSet. In .NET 2.0, many of the tasks that could previously only be performed by a DataSet can also be tackled by a DataTable; such as XML transformation.

DataSet with two tables in master-detail relationship

It gets a little complicated and code-heavy to map to an appropriately nested XML from a DataSet with master-detail tables. First, you need to specify the primary key of the master table. Second, you have to register the foreign key of the detail table. Finally, you must set to true the Nested property of the DataSet.

The following is the output XML File:

DataSet with three or more tables to XML

While it is quite manageable and even fun to translate a two-master-detail-tabled DataSet to an XML file, it is quite hopeless to go beyond. I mean: If you want to rely only on the built-in methods of DataSet and get the XML file elegantly nested in multiple levels. Of course, it is a different story if you are willing to sweat and traverse among the rows and columns of the different tables of a DataSet.

Summary

While relational database remains the major database technology and crucial infrastructure of most business and web applications, XML has shown clear advantages and great promises in data exchange and storage. Therefore, many database and middleware vendors have taken strides to enable the integration and communication of both technologies. ADO .NET is no exception. And the above article showed how easy it is to transform from XML to DataSet and backwards.

References

<<  Previous Article Continue reading and see our next or previous articles Next Article >>

About Xun Ding

Web developer, Data Analyst, GIS Programmer

This author has published 12 articles on DotNetSlackers. View other articles or the complete profile here.

Other articles in this category


A Feature-driven Comparison of Entity Framework and NHibernate-2nd Level Caching
Where would you place caching in your layered solution? Two main patterns exist for caching in appli...
A Feature-driven Comparison of Entity Framework and NHibernate - Queries
Let's explore what Entity Framework and NHibernate has to offer when it comes to their query capabil...
A Feature-driven Comparison of Entity Framework and NHibernate—Fetch Plans
This article is about fetch plans-a recognized and common way for developers to instruct the O/RM ab...
A Feature-driven Comparison of Entity Framework and NHibernate - Self-tracking entities
In this article, Dino Esposito introduces self-tracking entities.
.NET type generation for NHibernate mapping collections
An overview of .NET type generation for NHibernate mapping collections.

You might also be interested in the following related blog posts


How To: Display Hierarchical Data with Row Details (RadGridView for Silverlight) read more
Whats New In Silverlight 3 - Multi-Select List Box read more
Create NHibernate classes using T4 read more
A Bad Idea, EF Entities over WCF read more
From LINQ to XPath and Back Again read more
"The security validation for this page is invalid" when calling the SharePoint Web Services read more
XML and Languages read more
XmlSchemaSet Thread Safety read more
Creating List Items with jQuery and the SharePoint Web Services read more
Converting from XmlDocument to XDocument read more
Top
 
 
 

Discussion


Subject Author Date
placeholder Helpful Dominik Ras 11/26/2011 6:48 PM
LINQ to XSD? Granville Barnett 9/11/2007 1:48 PM
placeholder RE: LINQ to XSD? Xun Ding 9/12/2007 1:44 PM
RE: RE: LINQ to XSD? Sonu Kapoor 9/12/2007 1:49 PM
placeholder RE: RE: RE: LINQ to XSD? Xun Ding 9/12/2007 3:38 PM
RE: RE: RE: RE: LINQ to XSD? Sonu Kapoor 9/12/2007 8:44 PM

Please login to rate or to leave a comment.