Update: The LINQ to XML extensibility story

Posted by: mikechampions weblog, on 18 Aug 2006 | View original | Bookmarked: 0 time(s)

In a previous post I wrote: There is no guarantee that XLinq classes can be subclassed effectively, although there are currently no plans to seal them.  The recommended way for applications to add functionality to XLinq is by using the annotation feature  to add application-defined objects to XLinq tree objects.  In other words, internal experience with building on top of XLinq has shown that the aggregation design pattern works better than inheritance to extend its functionality. ...

Advertisement
Free Agile Project Management Tool from Telerik
TeamPulse Community Edition helps your team effectively capture requirements, manage project plans, assign and track work, and most importantly, be continually connected with each other.
Category: XLinq | Other Posts: View all posts by this blogger | Report as irrelevant | View bloggers stats | Views: 1375 | Hits: 71

Similar Posts

  • Swivel Behavior in Silverlight 3 more
  • System.Data.Linq.Binary is not XmlSerializable more
  • A Bad Idea, EF Entities over WCF more
  • From LINQ to XPath and Back Again more
  • "The security validation for this page is invalid" when calling the SharePoint Web Services more
  • XML and Languages more
  • XmlSchemaSet Thread Safety more
  • Creating List Items with jQuery and the SharePoint Web Services more
  • Converting from XmlDocument to XDocument more
  • Animation Hack Using Attached Properties in Silverlight more

News Categories

.NET | Agile | Ajax | Architecture | ASP.NET | BizTalk | C# | Certification | Data | DataGrid | DataSet | Debugger | DotNetNuke | Events | GridView | IIS | Indigo | JavaScript | Mobile | Mono | Patterns and Practices | Performance | Podcast | Refactor | Regex | Security | Sharepoint | Silverlight | Smart Client Applications | Software | SQL | VB.NET | Visual Studio | W3 | WCF | WinFx | WPF | WSE | XAML | XLinq | XML | XSD