Is Classic WebForms More Mature Than ASP.NET MVC?

Posted by: Jeffrey Palermo, on 29 Jan 2009 | View original | Bookmarked: 0 time(s)

In my last post about ASP.NET MVC, Jeff Gonzalez referred to WebForms as "Classic ASP.NET".  I had to take notice since when ASP.NET can out, we spoke about "Classic ASP".  This mere reference is interesting. His comment goes on to talk about how ASP.NET MVC isn't mature and not as "rich" as WebForms, but it also mentions the risks around using beta software for enterprise software. My comments around this relate to the risks of using new, unproven, software.  SQL Server 2008 is still...

Advertisement
Free Agile Project Management Tool from Telerik
TeamPulse Community Edition helps your team effectively capture requirements, manage project plans, assign and track work, and most importantly, be continually connected with each other.
Category: ASP.NET | Other Posts: View all posts by this blogger | Report as irrelevant | View bloggers stats | Views: 770 | Hits: 74

Similar Posts

  • ASP.NET MVC - Is WebForms the VisiCalc of Web Development? more
  • MvcContrib version control has moved to GitHub more
  • You should NOT use ASP.NET MVC if. . . more
  • Is ASP.NET MVC a half-baked solution? more
  • MvcContrib v1.0 Released! Download now more
  • ASP.NET MVC Release Candidate 2 more
  • Donut Caching in ASP.NET MVC more
  • Will ASP.NET MVC be the main web UI platform for ASP.NET? more
  • .NET vNext: Bridging Architectures more

News Categories

.NET | Agile | Ajax | Architecture | ASP.NET | BizTalk | C# | Certification | Data | DataGrid | DataSet | Debugger | DotNetNuke | Events | GridView | IIS | Indigo | JavaScript | Mobile | Mono | Patterns and Practices | Performance | Podcast | Refactor | Regex | Security | Sharepoint | Silverlight | Smart Client Applications | Software | SQL | VB.NET | Visual Studio | W3 | WCF | WinFx | WPF | WSE | XAML | XLinq | XML | XSD